Long Lifecycle Flooring Strategy for Public Buildings: Specifying Rubber at RIBA Stages 0–2

Most public buildings are designed to last decades. The structure is engineered for forty years or more. The services are modelled for twenty five.The façade is detailed for durability. Yet the floor, one of the most heavily stressed elements in the building, is often specified as if it were temporary.

That contradiction is rarely discussed at RIBA Stage 0, but it should be. If a building is intended to operate for twenty five years or more under sustained pressure, the flooring strategy must align with that intent. Otherwise, the floor becomes the weakest link in an otherwise durable asset.

Flooring in high-demand environments is not decorative. It is an operational infrastructure. It carries millions of footfalls, absorbs rolling and point loads, endures repeated mechanical cleaning and is exposed to moisture, debris and impact. The relevant question is not whether it complied at handover. The question is whether it still performs in year ten, year fifteen and year twenty five.

Lifecycle Alignment Begins at Stage 0

If sustainability and whole-life value are genuine objectives, flooring decisions belong at RIBA Stages 0-2, not at Stage 4, when products are compared on rate alone. A system that requires replacement halfway through the building’s operational life does not simply double its installation cost - It doubles embodied carbon, doubles disruption and increases cumulative maintenance exposure. Durability is therefore not a secondary attribute. It is central to responsible specification.

Rubber as a Long Term Performance Platform

High performance rubber flooring is often associated with resilience under heavy footfall. That is only part of the argument. The more compelling case is alignment with long life assets.

Rubber offers engineered slip resistance built into the system rather than relying solely on surface texture. It provides dimensional stability under sustained traffic and resists indentation and traffic lane formation. It remains compatible with rigorous mechanical cleaning regimes and offers the potential for extended service life measured in decades rather than cycles.

Whether specified at 2 mm for pedestrian dominant circulation or in thicker gauges where rolling loads increase, rubber provides a scalable performance platform. It is not a short term surface. It is a long term infrastructure layer.

‍‍

Joint Reduction is Risk Reduction

Installation detail also becomes a lifecycle issue in large public buildings. Artigo rubber is available in 1.9 metre wide rolls, while many alternative rubber systems are produced at approximately 1.22 metres wide. In a 50 metre corridor, this difference can result in approximately fifty per cent more longitudinal joints when narrower rolls are used.

Every joint is a mechanical interface, and every interface carries stress. Under sustained traffic and frequent cleaning, seams are the areas most likely to show wear first. Reducing seam frequency strengthens the entire installation. Wider rolls mean fewer welds or seams to maintain, reduced longterm stress concentration and cleaner visual lines across large circulation spaces. Width is not a manufacturing detail. It is part of the performance strategy.

The Uncomfortable Comparison

Many resilient sheet systems can achieve slip compliance at installation. The divergence appears over time. Surface dependent performance can reduce under abrasion. Decorative wear layers can fatigue. Shorter lifecycle products increase replacement frequency, which in turn increases embodied carbon and operational disruption.

A floor replaced twice within twenty years cannot reasonably be described as a low carbon solution, regardless of its initial certification. In contrast, a well specified rubber system designed for twenty five years of service reduces replacement cycles, reduces disruption and lowers cumulative carbon impact. Durability is sustainability.

From Stadia to Hospitals to Transport Hubs

Stadia make the pressure visible. High density footfall, rapid surges of movement and intense cleaning regimes expose weaknesses quickly. But the same principles apply in hospitals, laboratories, transport interchanges, universities and civic buildings. If the asset is designed for permanence, the floor should not be designed for renewal.

Strategic Conclusion

If flooring is treated as a late stage rate comparison, the opportunity to manage long term risk has already been reduced. If it is defined early in the lifecycle, rubber is often the logical outcome. Not because it is fashionable and not because it carries a sustainability slogan, but because it aligns with the intended life of the building.

The question for designers and asset owners is straightforward. Is the floor aligned with the building’s design life, or will it become the first element to fail?

In long life public buildings, the answer should be clear.

‍

‍

We feel that each and every project is unique so please speak to us directly regarding your scheme. Our blog is written for information purposes only.

‍